Priceless Democracy
With the curtain finally coming down
on the 14th General Elections, it is perhaps an appropriate time to
count the cost of the month-long extravaganza. According to one
estimate, between 1967 and 2004, the government spending on
parliamentary polls has increased from Rs 1.68 crore to Rs 1,300 crore.
Taking into account inflation, the rise, in real terms, is close to 60
times. In comparison, the size of the electorate has gone up only by 2.7
times over this period. Shocking? Not really, because increase in
electoral expenditure is, in part, explained by the maturing of our
democratic process. Since the first polls in 1952, India's democracy has
become far more inclusive in character. Particularly after the 1990s,
dalits and backwards have become significant players in the political
process, contesting and voting in ever increasing numbers. To the extent
that this assertion is still viewed as a challenge by entrenched
interests, it sparks off poll violence in certain regions.
Not surprisingly, more and more security forces are being deployed in
each successive election to counter the threat of violence. The extra
paraphernalia comes at a cost. Ironically, this democratic upsurge, has
also manifested itself in the criminalisation of politics. The rise of
the Pappu Yadavs and the Shahbuddins of the electoral arena is as much a
reflection of this as of the failure of the Indian state to deliver
basic social and economic goods.
Elsewhere in the country, the electoral process is under siege from
mindless, anti-democratic extremism - ranging from Kashmiri militancy to
the 'red menace' in the central and eastern parts of the country. Each
additional threat has ramped up the electoral costs. It is, therefore,
necessary to place the Rs 1,300 crore in perspective. The Indian state,
let's not forget, routinely forks out much larger sums of money on other
questionable ends without any eyebrows being raised. In the end,
however, the electoral imperative is beyond any cost-benefit calculus.
Because no price is too high to pay for democracy in a heterogeneous
polity like ours.
|